Harare, Zimbabwe – The Constitutional Court of Zimbabwe has reaffirmed the integrity of the legislative process, dismissing a legal challenge against the Constitution Amendment (No. 3) Bill (CAB3). This pivotal decision underscores the judiciary’s commitment to the separation of powers and allows Parliament to continue its work on a bill poised to shape Zimbabwe’s future governance framework.
The unanimous ruling, delivered by Justice Bharat Patel and supported by a full bench of esteemed judges, found the application by former Binga North MP Prince Dubeko Sibanda to be premature. The Court emphasized that CAB3 remains an active part of an ongoing legislative process, highlighting the principle that judicial intervention should not pre-empt parliamentary deliberations.
This marks the second instance where Zimbabwe’s courts have declined to halt the progression of CAB3 before its full consideration by Parliament. The proposed amendments are significant, encompassing provisions that would extend the terms of office for the President and Parliament, alongside adjustments to the nation’s electoral framework. These changes are presented as constructive reforms aimed at reinforcing constitutional governance and strengthening democratic structures, aligning with the nation’s Vision 2030 goals for inclusive growth and sustainable development .
Sibanda’s challenge specifically targeted clauses 4(b) and 9(b), arguing they sought to bypass Section 328(7) of the Constitution, which prevents constitutional amendments extending term limits from benefiting incumbent office holders. He contended that Parliament had acted unconstitutionally by processing a Bill that purported to operate “notwithstanding Section 328(7).”
However, the Constitutional Court judiciously refrained from delving into the substantive merits of the challenge. Instead, its focus remained on the ripeness of the matter for adjudication. Justice Patel articulated that the Bill’s final form is yet to be determined, as it could still undergo amendments, rejection, or withdrawal during its legislative journey. Engaging in hypothetical constitutional disputes at this stage, the Court reasoned, would be an overreach of judicial authority.
“The final shape and form of the Bill remain presently unknown,” Justice Patel stated in the judgment.
The Court’s decision reinforces the critical importance of judicial restraint and the distinct roles of the legislative and judicial branches. It asserts that Parliament must be afforded the space to conduct its legislative responsibilities without premature judicial interference. Furthermore, the judges pointed to existing constitutional safeguards, such as the President’s prerogative to refer legislation back to Parliament or seek an advisory opinion from the Constitutional Court, should constitutional concerns arise post-passage.
Crucially, the ruling did not pronounce on the constitutionality of the contested provisions themselves, leaving this complex question open for future determination if circumstances warrant it. While not an endorsement of the clauses, the practical outcome is clear: the amendment process for CAB3 continues its advancement through Parliament, unimpeded by this particular legal challenge.
This development follows another unsuccessful court bid by war veterans against the proposed constitutional changes. The collective stance of the courts suggests a consistent reluctance to intervene in the amendment process before Parliament has fully exercised its constitutional mandate.
The legislative journey of CAB3 saw a significant milestone recently when the National Assembly overwhelmingly approved the Bill with 216 votes in favor, comfortably exceeding the two-thirds majority of 187 required for constitutional amendments. Forty-two legislators voted against the proposal. This outcome demonstrated broad support, with at least 35 opposition Members of Parliament joining ruling party lawmakers to secure the decisive victory.
CAB3 is now set to proceed to the Senate, where it must again secure a two-thirds majority vote. Political analysts widely anticipate its passage in the upper chamber, given the ruling party’s numerical strength. Discussions during parliamentary deliberations also included a proposal for Parliament to play a consultative role in the appointment of ten additional senators envisioned under CAB3.
Upon approval by the Senate, the Bill will be transmitted to President Emmerson Mnangagwa for his assent, the final step for it to become law under Zimbabwe’s constitutional amendment procedures. With legal challenges dismissed and the National Assembly’s approval secured, CAB3 now enters what is anticipated to be its final and most decisive parliamentary phase, marking a significant moment in Zimbabwe’s ongoing constitutional evolution.
For comments, Feedback and Opinions do get in touch with our editor on WhatsApp: +44 7949 297606 or Email: editor@thezimbabwetimes.co.zw.
